What is the value of? 1/3÷4

3 Answers
Apr 1, 2018

1/12 is the value.

Explanation:

What you do is the KCF method. Keep, Change, Flip. You would keep the 1/3. Then you change the divide sign to a multiply sign. Then you flip the 4 to 1/4. You do that since 1/4 is the reciprocal of 4.

1/3 div 4 = 1/3 xx 1/4

Apr 2, 2018

1/12

Explanation:

You can work it out using the usual fraction division process, or just through what is happening...

If you take one third and cut it in half ( same as dividing by 2), then each piece will be 1/6. (More pieces, therefore they get smaller)

If you take 1/6 and cut it in half, the pieces get smaller again. Each piece will be 1/12

1/3 div 4 = 1/3 div 2 div 2 = 1/12

A nifty short cut: To divide a fraction in half, either halve the top (if it is even) or double the bottom:

2/3 div 2 = 1/3

4/11 div 2 = 2/11" "larr pretty obvious if you think about it!!

5/9 div 2 = 5/18

7/8 div 2 = 7/16

In the same way: To divide a fraction by 3 in half, either divide the by 3 (if possible) or treble the bottom:

6/11 div 3 = 2/11" "larr share out 6 portions equally.

5/8 div 3 = 5/24

Apr 7, 2018

This is why the 'turn upside down and multiply' works.

Explanation:

color(blue)("Answering the question using the shortcut method")

Write as 1/3-: 4/1

giving: 1/3xx1/4= (1xx1)/(3xx4)=1/12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
color(white)()

color(blue)("The teaching bit")

A fraction structure is such that we have:

("numerator")/("denominator") ->("count")/("size indicator of what you are counting")

YOU CAN NOT color(red)(ul("DIRECTLY")) ADD, SUBTRACT OR DIVIDE ONLY THE COUNTS UNLESS THE SIZE INDICATORS ARE THE SAME.

You have been applying this rule for years without realising it!
Consider the numbers: 1,2,3,4,5 and so on. Did you know that it mathematically correct to write them as: 1/1,2/1,3/1,4/1,5/1 and so on. So their SIZE INDICATORS ARE THE SAME.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
color(blue)("Explaining the principle using a different example")

color(brown)("I have chosen to use a different example as I wished")color(brown)("to avoid using 1's. In avoiding 1's the behaviour is more obvious.")

Consider the example color(green)(3/color(red)(4)-:2/color(red)(8)")

Turn upside down and change the sign to multiply

color(green)(3/color(red)(4)xxcolor(red)(8)/2 larr" as per the method"

Note that: 4xx2=8 =2xx4. This is commutative.

Using the principle of being commutative swap the 4 and 2 round the other way giving:

color(green)(color(white)("ddd")ubrace(3/2)color(white)("ddd")xxcolor(white)("ddd")color(red)(ubrace(8/4))

color(green)("directly dividing ") color(red)("Converting the")
color(green)(color(white)("dd")"the counts")color(white)("ddddddd") color(red)("counts")

Now split them up like this:

( color(green)( 3)xxcolor(red)(8/4)) -:color(green)(2)

color(magenta)(color(white)("ddd") 6 color(white)("dddd")-:2)

And compare to the original of color(green)([3/color(red)(4)]-:2/color(red)(8)")

color(white)()

color(green)([3/color(red)(4)color(black)(xx2/2)] color(green)(-:)2/color(red)(8))color(white)("dddd")->color(white)("dddd")color(magenta)(6)/8-:color(magenta)(2)/8
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So the color(red)(8/4) is the equivalent action of making the size indicators the same and adjusting the counts to suit.

color(red)("IT IS A CONVERSION FACTOR")
So by turning upside down' and multiplying you are applying a conversion and directly dividing the counts all at once.