How do I find the eigenvalues for the finite potential well of width 2L?
Derive a transcendental equation for the allowed energies and solve it graphically in the finite well of the height V_0
V(x) = {(-V_0 ,|x|>=L),(0, "elsewhere"):}
alphatanalpha = k (even parity)
alphacotalpha = -k (odd parity)
i hope that u understand what alpha and k are.
but to mark the energy eigenvalues
i had to make circle of radius alpha + k
what is the physical reason behind this?
Derive a transcendental equation for the allowed energies and solve it graphically in the finite well of the height
i hope that u understand what
but to mark the energy eigenvalues
i had to make circle of radius
what is the physical reason behind this?
1 Answer
[Here is the Excel sheet I made while doing this.](https://www.dropbox.com/s/hrwleaifu9oos9c/GRAPH_-_Finite_Potential_Well_Solutions.xlsx?dl=0)
The radius of the circle just tells you what you set the height of your potential well to be. However, its radius is given by
lim_(V_0 -> oo) "Finite Well" = "Infinite Potential Well"
If we choose
ul(E" "" "" "" "" "" "E//V_0" "" "color(white)(.)"Quantum Number"" "" ")
(1.63948ℏ^2)/(2mL^2)" "" "0.081974" "" "1.28042
(6.44190ℏ^2)/(2mL^2)" "" "0.322095" "" "2.53809
(13.89150ℏ^2)/(2mL^2)" "color(white)(.)0.694575" "" "3.72713
The graph below utilizes a well width of
Well, let's start by properly defining the problem... instead of defining a tunnelling problem with a barrier of width
V(x) = {(V_0, |x| >= L), (0, -L < x < L):}
That way, we get:
![https://upload.wikimedia.org/]()
Then, let's define the eigenfunctions for each region
psi_(I) = Ae^(-alphax) + Be^(alphax), " "" "" "" "-oo < x < -L
psi_(II) = Csin(kx) + Dcos(kx), " "-L < x < L
psi_(III) = Fe^(-alphax) + Ge^(alphax), " "" "" "" "L < x < oo where:
alpha = sqrt((2m(V_0 - E))/ℏ^2) ," "E < V_0 for bound states
k = sqrt((2mE)/ℏ^2)
Since the wave function must vanish at
EVEN SOLUTIONS
For the even solutions, the
psi_(I) = Be^(alphax), " "" "" "-oo < x < -L
psi_(II) = Dcos(kx), " "-L < x < L
psi_(III) = Be^(-alphax), " "" "" "L < x < oo
Now we apply the continuity conditions.
ul(psi_(I)(-L) = psi_(II)(-L)) :
Be^(-alphaL) = Dcos(-kL) " "" "" "bb((1))
ul((dpsi_(I)(-L))/(dx) = (dpsi_(II)(-L))/(dx)) :
alphaBe^(-alphaL) = -kDsin(-kL) " "bb((2))
ul(psi_(II)(L) = psi_(III)(L)) :
Dcos(kL) = Be^(-alphaL) " "" "" "" "bb((3))
ul((dpsi_(II)(L))/(dx) = (dpsi_(III)(L))/(dx))
kDsin(kL) = alphaBe^(-alphaL) " "" "" "bb((4))
Taking
color(green)(alpha = ktan(kL))
Now, let
From the definitions of
u_0^2 -= u^2 + v^2 = alpha^2L^2 + k^2L^2
= (2mL^2(V_0 - E))/ℏ^2 + (2mL^2E)/ℏ^2 = (2mL^2V_0)/ℏ^2
So now for the even solution, we can graph
alphaL = kLtan(kL)
or
u = sqrt(u_0^2 - v^2) = vtanv
Now we can simply use Excel to graph
The intersections give the quantum numbers for each eigenvalue.
Suppose
For the even solutions we got
For now, each eigenvalue is given in terms of the quantum number
v_n^2 = k_n^2L^2 = (2mL^2E_n)/ℏ^2
=> color(green)(E_n = (ℏ^2v_n^2)/(2mL^2))
Now let's move on to the odd solutions.
ODD SOLUTIONS
Now the origin is a rotation axis, so that
psi_(I) = Be^(alphax), " "" "" "-oo < x < -L
psi_(II) = Csin(kx), " "-L < x < L
psi_(III) = -Be^(-alphax), " "" "L < x < oo
Now we apply the continuity conditions as before.
ul(psi_(I)(-L) = psi_(II)(-L)) :
Be^(-alphaL) = Csin(-kL) " "" "" "bb((1))
ul((dpsi_(I)(-L))/(dx) = (dpsi_(II)(-L))/(dx)) :
alphaBe^(-alphaL) = kCcos(-kL) " "" "bb((2))
ul(psi_(II)(L) = psi_(III)(L)) :
Csin(kL) = -Be^(-alphaL) " "" "" "bb((3))
ul((dpsi_(II)(L))/(dx) = (dpsi_(III)(L))/(dx))
kCcos(kL) = alphaBe^(-alphaL) " "" "" "bb((4))
Taking
color(green)(alpha = -kcot(kL))
Using the same substitutions as before, we again graph
In this case our well only had three energy levels. Here we again had
COMBINED SOLUTIONS
And combining them onto one graph, we get the three energy levels in this finite well with
color(blue)(E_1 = (1.63948ℏ^2)/(2mL^2))
color(blue)(E_2 = (6.44190ℏ^2)/(2mL^2))
color(blue)(E_3 = (13.89150ℏ^2)/(2mL^2))
And of course, if we let
The choice of