What is the difference between E and E^@ in electrochemistry?

1 Answer
May 29, 2017

Well, the mathematical difference is E - E^@ = -(RT)/(nF)lnQ... The conceptual difference is nonstandard vs. standard conditions.


We define standard conditions to be 25^@ "C" and "1 atm" pressure, with "1 M" concentrations.

Many chemical functions, particularly in thermodynamics and electrochemistry, are temperature-dependent. Thus, we must be able to account for that...

We recall that for the Gibbs' free energy:

DeltaG = DeltaG^@ + RTlnQ

(if you do not recall this equation, look here for a derivation.)

and:

DeltaG^@ = -nFE^@

(which I will not derive as it is a simple unit conversion.)

The first equation uses RTlnQ as a correction factor for nonstandard conditions for the Gibbs' free energy. It turns out that the second equation also applies to the nonstandard DeltaG.

Hence:

-nFE = -nFE^@ + RTlnQ

Dividing by -nF gives:

bb(E = E^@ - (RT)/(nF)lnQ)

which is the purest version of the Nernst equation (before any simplifications), where:

  • n is the number of electrons transferred in the redox reaction
  • F = "96485 C/mol e"^(-) is the Faraday constant.
  • R and T are known from the ideal gas law.
  • Q is the reaction quotient, i.e. not-yet-equilibrium constant.
  • E is the "electromotive force" for the cell process.
  • E^@ is, of course, E at standard conditions.

Likewise, -(RT)/(nF)lnQ is a correction factor to "convert" from standard to nonstandard conditions. If we are at standard conditions, then...

E = E^@ - cancel((("8.314472 J/mol"cdot"K")("298.15 K"))/(nF)ln(1))^(0)

=> E = E^@

at 25^@ "C", "1 atm" pressure, and "1 M" concentrations.