What is the difference between #E# and #E^@# in electrochemistry?
1 Answer
Well, the mathematical difference is
We define standard conditions to be
Many chemical functions, particularly in thermodynamics and electrochemistry, are temperature-dependent. Thus, we must be able to account for that...
We recall that for the Gibbs' free energy:
#DeltaG = DeltaG^@ + RTlnQ# (if you do not recall this equation, look here for a derivation.)
and:
#DeltaG^@ = -nFE^@# (which I will not derive as it is a simple unit conversion.)
The first equation uses
Hence:
#-nFE = -nFE^@ + RTlnQ#
Dividing by
#bb(E = E^@ - (RT)/(nF)lnQ)# which is the purest version of the Nernst equation (before any simplifications), where:
#n# is the number of electrons transferred in the redox reaction#F = "96485 C/mol e"^(-)# is the Faraday constant.#R# and#T# are known from the ideal gas law.#Q# is the reaction quotient, i.e. not-yet-equilibrium constant.#E# is the "electromotive force" for the cell process.#E^@# is, of course,#E# at standard conditions.
Likewise,
#E = E^@ - cancel((("8.314472 J/mol"cdot"K")("298.15 K"))/(nF)ln(1))^(0)#
#=> E = E^@#
at