What is the difference between E and E^@ in electrochemistry?
1 Answer
Well, the mathematical difference is
We define standard conditions to be
Many chemical functions, particularly in thermodynamics and electrochemistry, are temperature-dependent. Thus, we must be able to account for that...
We recall that for the Gibbs' free energy:
DeltaG = DeltaG^@ + RTlnQ (if you do not recall this equation, look here for a derivation.)
and:
DeltaG^@ = -nFE^@ (which I will not derive as it is a simple unit conversion.)
The first equation uses
Hence:
-nFE = -nFE^@ + RTlnQ
Dividing by
bb(E = E^@ - (RT)/(nF)lnQ) which is the purest version of the Nernst equation (before any simplifications), where:
n is the number of electrons transferred in the redox reactionF = "96485 C/mol e"^(-) is the Faraday constant.R andT are known from the ideal gas law.Q is the reaction quotient, i.e. not-yet-equilibrium constant.E is the "electromotive force" for the cell process.E^@ is, of course,E at standard conditions.
Likewise,
E = E^@ - cancel((("8.314472 J/mol"cdot"K")("298.15 K"))/(nF)ln(1))^(0)
=> E = E^@
at