How to demonstrate this?We have equilateral trinagle DeltaOAB:O_(((0,0))),A_(((m,n)));m,ninNN;m,n!=0 andB_(((x,y)));x,yin(0,oo).Demonstrate that B can not have both coordinates natural numbers.

2 Answers
Apr 15, 2017

See below.

Explanation:

Let R(pi/3)=((Cos(pi/3), -Sin(pi/3)),(Sin(pi/3), Cos(pi/3)))= ((1/2,-sqrt3/2),(sqrt3/2,1/2))

be the rotation matrix which rotates pi/3 radians.

Having a vertice at the origin, If (m,n) is an equilateral triangle vertice then the other vertice is located at

((x),(y)) = R(pmpi/3)cdot((m),(n))

Taking the counterclockwise rotation to follow we have

((x),(y)) = R(pi/3)cdot((m),(n))=((m/2 - (sqrt[3] n)/2), ((sqrt[3] m)/2 + n/2) )

so clearly ((x),(y)) can not be represented as an integer couple.

Note that nm ne 0

Apr 23, 2017

For Proof, refer to the Explanation.

Explanation:

We use Reductio Ad Absurdum to prove the Result.

For this, suppose, to the contrary, that, there exists an equilateral

DeltaOAB, having vertices O(0,0), A(m,n), B(x,y), such that,

m,n,x,y in NN, and, m^2+n^2!=0.

Knowing that, Area A_(Delta)of an equilateral DeltaOAB is given by,

A_(Delta)=sqrt3/4*OA^2=sqrt3/4(m^2+n^2)..........(ast).

On the other hand, from Co-ordinate Geometry,

A_(Delta)=1/2|D|, where,

D=|(0,0,1),(m,n,1),(x,y,1)|=|my-nx|,

:. A_(Delta)=1/2|my-nx|............(ast').

(ast), &, (ast') rArr 2|my-nx|/(m^2+n^2)=sqrt3, which is a

contradiction, because, with, m,n,x,y in NN, &, m^2+n^2ne0,

the L.H.S. is a Natural No., whrereas, the R.H.S., an Irrational No.

Therefore, our supposition that all the co-ordinates of an equilateral

triangle are Natural Nos. is False.

Henc, the Proof.