Knowing that elemental molecules (made of only one element, like O_2, Cl_2, Br_2) etc have 0 enthalpy, and the equation for enthalpy
DeltaH_("rxn")=Sigman*"products"-Sigman*"reactants",
or overall enthalpy (DeltaH_("rxn")) is the enthalpy of products minus enthalpy of reactants, we can rearrange equation 3..
TiCl_4->TiCl_2+Cl_2, DeltaH=+273kJ
273=(TiCl_2+Cl_2)-TiCl_4 (products minus reactants)
273=TiCl_2-TiCl_4 (enthalpy of Cl_2 is 0)
TiCl_4=TiCl_2-273 (rearranged algebraically)
Now you can substitute this into equation 2., again using the products minus reactants equation
TiBr_2+SnCl_4->SnBr_2+TiCl_4, DeltaH=-74kJ
-74=(SnBr_2+TiCl_4)-(TiBr_2+SnCl_4)
-74=SnBr_2+TiCl_2-273-TiBr_2-SnCl_4 (substituting in equation 3. and expanding out everything)
199=SnBr_2+TiCl_2-TiBr_2-SnCl_4 (rearranging, adding 273 to both sides)
You also have equation 1., which you can use products minus reactants to find
SnCl_2+TiBr_2->SnBr_2+TiCl_2, DeltaH=+4.2kJ
4.2=(SnBr_2+TiCl_2)-(SnCl_2+TiBr_2) (products minus reactants)
4.2=SnBr_2+TiCl_2-SnCl_2-TiBr_2 (expanding out brackets)
Now you can equate equations 1. and 2. in their new form, as so
SnBr_2+TiCl_2-SnCl_2-TiBr_2+194.8=SnBr_2+TiCl_2-TiBr_2-SnCl_4
because if you add 194.8 to equation 1 it equals 199 in total, the same as equation 2. With these two equal to each other, you can cancel out the similarities on both sides and find what's left.
Both sides have a SnBr_2, so you can cancel that. They also have a TiCl_2 and a -TiBr_2, so get rid of those from each side, leaving
-SnCl_2+194.8=-SnCl_4
SnCl_4-SnCl_2=-194.8kJ
This is the answer to the question in the form of products minus reactants, because you can see the product is SnCl_4 and the reactants are SnCl_2 and Cl_2, though Cl_2 has an enthalpy of 0 so it can be ignored.