What is the difference between the Rydberg constants R_H = "109678.77 cm"^(-1)RH=109678.77 cm1 and R_(H) = 2.18 xx 10^(-18) "J"RH=2.18×1018J?

1 Answer
Jan 6, 2017

For a comparison of ~~109677109677 and 109737.32109737.32 "cm"^(-1)cm1, see this answer I gave earlier today.

As for R_H = 109678.77174307_(10)RH=109678.7717430710 "cm"^(-1)cm1 and R_(H) = 2.1787xx10^(-18) "J"RH=2.1787×1018J (Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.), clearly, the difference is in the units. We have reciprocal distance vs. energy.

These do NOT have equivalent meanings, but they DO interconvert!

The only difference in their usage, which is the more interesting part, is the lefthand side of the Rydberg equation for electron relaxation (i.e. DeltaE < 0) in the HYDROGEN atom:

bb(1/lambda = -R_H(1/n_f^2 - 1/n_i^2))

where R_H = 109678.77174307_(10) "cm"^(-1), lambda > 0 is the wavelength in "cm", and n_f and n_i are final and initial energy levels that the electron moved to and from, respectively.

bb(DeltaE = -R_H(1/n_f^2 - 1/n_i^2))

where R_(H) = 2.1787xx10^(-18) "J", the negative of the ground-state energy of the hydrogen atom (whose actual signed value was -"13.6 eV").

You can verify that the "cm"^(-1) version converts to "13.6 eV" here.

If you recall, the energy absorbed by the electron is equal to the energy of the photon emitted during the electronic relaxation.

So, E_"photon" = |DeltaE| = hnu = (hc)/lambda.

You can convert one Rydberg equation into the other by dividing by hc:

DeltaE = (hc)/lambda

=> (DeltaE)/(hc) = 1/lambda

Therefore, you can convert one Rydberg constant to the other. If we temporarily label the "cm"^(-1) version as R_H^"*" and the "J" version as R_H, then:

R_H^"*" = R_H/(hc)

= 2.1787xx10^(-18) cancel"J" xx 1/((6.626xx10^(-34) cancel"J"cdotcancel"s")(2.998xx10^(10) "cm/"cancel"s"))

= "109676.6996 cm"^(-1)

~~ 109678.77174307_(10) "cm"^(-1)