Why is iron a better conductor of electricity than zinc?

1 Answer
anor277
Jun 9, 2016

This is an excellent question, and one which made me think twice. It is arguably a manifestation of metallic bonding.

Explanation:

In metallic bonding, each metal atom is conceived to contribute 1 or more electrons to the metallic lattice to give, as commonly expressed, #"positive ions in a sea of electrons"#.

Such a picture of delocalized bonding rationalizes common metallic properties: hardness; non-molecularity; malleability; ductility ; and electrical conductivity. Because we have a partially filled #d# shell with the transition metal, the iron core should be able to commit more valence electrons to the lattice, and thus here the metallic bond is stronger.

In contrast, #Zn#, with a full #d# shell, can only contribute its two valence electrons to the metallic structure, resulting in lower melting and boiling points, and less(?) electrical conductivity.

Anyway, take all this with a gain of salt. There may be better answers available from some materials science guru.

Related questions
See all questions in Periodic Trends in Atomic Size
Impact of this question
3434 views around the world
You can reuse this answer
Creative Commons License