Question #9ce73

2 Answers
Jul 1, 2017

This equality cannot be solved for t as there are no real solutions for t. However, there are possible complex solutions.

Explanation:

Using log laws we can simplify somewhat and get the t's on the same side:

log5(37t)=log5(52t)

log5(37t)=2t

log5(3)+log5(7t)=2t

log5(3)+tlog5(7)=2t

log5(3)=2ttlog5(7)

I don't even think this form is simpler than the original, I'm not sure if it's worth doing... But more importantly, how do we know whether we can actually solve for t?

Let's set:

y1=37t

y2=52t

Setting the two equations equal to each other will allow you to solve for the t values where the two graphs intersect (this is what the original question asked). You should be able to visually find these as the point(s) where the two graphs cross each other.

y1=y2

37t=52t

So let's plot the two together and have a look.

meme

As t goes to negative , y1 approaches zero and y2 approaches 1. They never cross. As t goes to positive the two graphs diverge once again and never cross. Because these two graphs never intersect, there aren't any real solutions for t.

So, I can't simplify the original equality any further and solve for t, unless we go into complex land. But I dare not tread there!

Jul 1, 2017

See below.

Explanation:

Applying log to both sides

log3+log7t=2tlog5

This equation has the structure

at+b=2t

with a=log7log5 and b=log3log5

Now using the Lambert function

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function

such that

y=xexx=W(y)

We will transform

at+b=2t

into a suitable form to be handled with the Lambert function so making ξ=(t+ba)

at+b=2tξ2ξ=r=1a2baξ=W(rlog2)log2

then

t=W(log2a2ba)log2ba or

t=log3log7W(2(log3log7)log2log5log7)log2

This gives a complex solution which is

t=0.8277510.465279i